Former US Open champion Sloane Stephens mentioned she helps the choice to strip Wimbledon of rating factors in response to the match banning Russian and Belarusian gamers following the invasion of Ukraine.
Additionally Learn: Kylian Mbappe in Place of Energy at PSG After Agreeing to New Deal
The transfer by the game’s most important excursions, the ATP and WTA, to withhold factors for Wimbledon — which runs from June 27-July 10 — threatens to scale back the Grand Slam to the standing of a high-profile exhibition occasion.
“I believe the choice that was taken was the right one,” Stephens mentioned Sunday after beating Germany’s Jule Niemeier within the first spherical at Roland Garros.
“I believe that there’s a lot of issues that occurred behind the scenes that the press will not be conscious of, and I believe there was lots of mishandling of how every thing was dealt with.”
WTA chief government Steve Simon mentioned that his organisation believed “that particular person athletes collaborating in a person sport shouldn’t be penalised solely due to their nationalities or the selections made by the governments of their nations.”
“Clearly I assist our CEO, I assist my council, I assist the gamers. The choice that’s been taken clearly wasn’t taken flippantly,” mentioned Stephens, a French Open runner-up in 2018.
“I believe if you find yourself backed right into a nook and that’s all you are able to do, I believe that’s why the choice was made, and I assist it.”
Wimbledon’s ban has dominated out a swathe of high gamers, together with males’s world quantity two Daniil Medvedev and final yr’s ladies’s semi-finalist Aryna Sabalenka of Belarus in addition to two-time main winner Victoria Azarenka.
However Wimbledon chiefs on the All England Membership branded the transfer by the ATP and WTA as “disproportionate”.
Thiem seems at ‘large image’
Casper Ruud, who has received seven of his eight titles on clay, mentioned it was unfair on grass-court specialists that they can’t earn rating factors at Wimbledon.
“It’s powerful to combine politics with sport,” Ruud mentioned after successful Saturday’s Geneva Open closing.
“Wimbledon isn’t the place I make most of my factors, so for me, it’s doesn’t matter an excessive amount of when you concentrate on the factors however for different gamers it’s after all unfair that they can’t even get the possibility.”
Dominic Thiem, the 2020 US Open champion, sought to place the difficulty into perspective.
“I believe it’s a troublesome determination for everyone, for some gamers it’s in all probability very painful,” he mentioned after exiting the French Open on Sunday.
“However we at all times have to remember the massive image that Wimbledon or all our tennis world, it’s simply actually no drawback in any respect.
“The actual drawback is there in Ukraine and let’s hope that there’s peace very quickly once more.”
Ons Jabeur, a quarter-finalist at Wimbledon final yr, mentioned “lots of gamers are upset” by the choice.
“I want we had factors, if I did quarter-final, for me the principle concern is… are they going to maintain the final yr’s factors, how are they going to interchange them, as a result of it’s not truthful if we drop all of the factors with out us defending something, particularly some individuals had finals, semi-finals,” she mentioned.
“So it is vitally, very powerful determination. I’m simply going to attempt to seize as many factors as I can within the grass season within the different tournaments.”